Is the United States Bankrupt?

Is the United States Bankrupt?


Date: Saturday, December 02, 2006 4:36 PM


<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER No. 1598 -- 12/02/2006 >>>>>

I found a study sponsored by the St. Louis Federal Reserve that is
shocking, to say the least. It didn't raise any eyebrows in the press, and
I can't remember anyone mentioning it in the election. Perhaps the fact
that our government is bankrupt just isn't as interesting as OJ Simpson's
book.

You might wonder why I'm doing a newsletter on the subject of national debt
considering that the topics are usually constrained to employment based
visas and outsourcing. Hang with me for awhile and you shall see!

We must keep in mind the bias inherent in the report as the Federal Reserve
is a private bank that has been empowered by Congress to control our
currency. Think about it this way -- suppose you were in debt up to your
ears, and then the banks declared that you were bankrupt. That would be a
bad situation --- BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO OUR ENTIRE
COUNTRY!

To read the 16 page study go here:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/07/Kotlikoff.pdf
Is the United States Bankrupt?
Laurence J. Kotlikoff
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, July/August 2006


Early in the study we are dosed with some very grim numbers, and dire
warnings.

This partial-equilibrium analysis
strongly suggests that the U.S. government is,
indeed, bankrupt, insofar as it will be unable to
pay its creditors, who, in this context, are current
and future generations to whom it has explicitly
or implicitly promised future net payments of
various kinds.

Unless the United States moves quickly to fundamentally
change and restrain its fiscal behavior, its bankruptcy
will become a foregone conclusion.

The $65.9 trillion gap is all
the more alarming because its calculation omits
the value of contingent government liabilities
and relies on quite optimistic assumptions about
increases over time in longevity and federal
healthcare expenditures.

Let's reiterate what he is saying. Out budget gap is:

$65,900,000,000,000

So the nation is teetering on being insolvent. We all know somebody is
going to pay - and it won't be the bankers who run the Federal Reserve.
There is hope for all of you that are old (like me!) because most of the
cost will be forced on your kids, not you. Clever, huh?

young and future generations
will, one way or other, collectively be forced
to pay $65.9 trillion more than they would have
to pay based on current tax and transfer schedules.

No good study would be complete without finding a solution to the national
debt crisis. This chapter asks some very interesting questions.

CAN IMMIGRATION,
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH,
OR CAPITAL DEEPENING SAVE
THE DAY?

The first option would be to boost productivity so we could pay the debt,
but that option won't get the job done.

Were productivity growth a certain cure for the
nations fiscal problems, the cure would already
have occurred.

The discussion on immigration is very important because it describes the
thinking of many open border advocates. They believe that we can solve our
problems by using immigration as a pyramid scheme to grow our way out of
debt. I was surprised that this study dispels that myth considering how
supportive the Fed is of H-1B.

Many members of the public as well as officials
of the government presume that expanding
immigration can cure what they take to be fundamentally
a demographic problem.

They are wrong on two counts.

First, at heart, ours is not a demographic
problem.

Second, it is mistake to think that immigration
can significantly alleviate the nations fiscal problem.
The reality is that immigrants arent cheap.
They require public goods and services. And they
become eligible for transfer payments. While most
immigrants pay taxes, these taxes barely cover
the extra costs they engender.

You have to read very closely to see how the author avoids the obvious fact
that offshoring and the immigration of high-skilled workers (H-1B) hurts
our middle class. The excerpt below is a typical gospel from faith-based
free-trade economic theory that losing factory jobs hurts a few people but
offshoring skilled jobs raises wages for Americans and create jobs.

trade with China, at least
in the short run, explains much of the relative
decline in the wages of low-skilled workers in the
developed world. Hence, we dont mean to suggest
here that all United States, European Union,
and Japanese workers are being helped by trade
with China, but rather that trade with China is,
on average, raising the wages of developed-world
workers and will continue to do so.

So what are we to do to avoid bankruptcy or the forced payment of our debt
by future generations? Well my friends, the answer is simple!

... the answer lies with China.

Why is China the answer? Because they have lots of money -- our money!

China is currently saving over a third of its national
income and growing at spectacularly high rates.

The thing about China is that they save a whole bunch of money, unlike
Americans who do nothing but spend money and accumulate debt. It's
interesting to note that in this entire study there were only muted hints
that the reason countries like China have so much cash is because we have
chosen to offshore entire industries there. China is saving money but only
because they have so much cash they don't know what to do with it!

Pay close attention to the euphemism that is used here - China is
"supplying capital to the rest of the world". Wouldn't it be far more
accurate to say that China is buying out the world?

China is saving so much that its running a current
account surplus. Not only is China supplying
capital to the rest of the world, its increasingly
doing so via direct investment. For example,
China is investing large sums in Iran, Africa, and
Eastern Europe.

Now comes the pitch -- he wants to allow China to use its piles of U.S.
dollars to buy our assets, like our energy infrastructure.

Although China holds close to a half trillion
U.S. dollars in reserves, primarily in U.S. Treasuries,
the United States sent a pretty strong message
in recent months that it doesnt welcome Chinese
direct investment.
It did so when it rejected the
Chinese National Petroleum Corporations bid to
purchase Unocal, a U.S. energy company.

So why, according to the author, did the U.S. reject the Unocal deal? It
was simple fear -- in other words there are a bunch of paranoid
protectionists in the U.S. that fear China. Those irrational protectionists
don't understand that China is the "world's savior".

Fear of Chinese investment in the United
States seems terribly misplaced.

China eventually becomes the worlds saver and,
thereby, the developed worlds savior with respect
to its long-run supply of capital and long-run
general equilibrium prospects.

In case you scoff at the power of the Federal Reserve to force us to accept
a buyout by the Chinese, tune in to the videos below.




*** Recommended Vidoes ***



The Federal Reserve and currency might seem like a boring subject. I used
to feel that way. Not any more! This video has convinced me that "He who
had the gold, makes the rules". If we understand who controls our currency
we understand who controls our nation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8753934454816686947&q=money+masters
The Money Masters - Part 1 of 2

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2665915773877500927&q=money+masters
The Money Masters - Part 2 of 2

The title of this next one seems extreme, but don't let it discourage you
from watching it. Within 5 minutes you will be hooked. It discusses our tax
system, currency, Federal Reserve, NAFTA, CAFTA, North American Union,
immigration, and what it all means.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198&q=america%3A+freedom+to+facism&hl=en
America Freedom to Fascism Authorized version




Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm

Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm

To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
email with UNSUbSCRIBE in the subject window







Back to archives